Reducing the risk of biogas leakage

AD plants have inherent weak spots, which make them susceptible to biogas leakage.
AD plants have inherent weak spots, which make them susceptible to biogas leakage.
Of the 964 plants surveyed, 85% were suffering from biogas leakage.
Of the 964 plants surveyed, 85% were suffering from biogas leakage.

The UK’s anaerobic digestion (AD) industry has grown by 350% in a decade but biogas leakage is still a problem, leading to environmental pollution and health and safety risks. This article examines how to protect plants from biogas leakage.

While many responsible plant operators monitor key parameters such as  temperature, digester biology and biogas production on a regular basis, there are many others who fail to check for gas leaks, believing it’s an issue which doesn’t affect their plant. The evidence proves otherwise. Over the last eight years, 85% of the 964 plants surveyed by FM BioEnergy in the UK and Germany were suffering from biogas leakage. A quarter of these were deemed ‘significant’ in terms of their leakage (>1,000l CH4/h), causing serious safety concerns and financial losses. Half of them had only minor leakages (< 100l CH4/h) while the rest were deemed ‘medium’ (< 1,000l CH4/h). In most cases, more than one type of leakage was present. If we translate this to the UK, it could mean that 550 plants are currently at risk, with 137 in danger of a serious safety breach or at financial risk. In addition, if each of these 550 plants was to leak an average of just 0.5% of theircapacity, it could equate to a potential loss of 37 GWhe-e a year, resulting in 6,000 tonnes of methane escaping into the atmosphere every year. Catastrophic risks The implications of this volume of methane being released are significant. According to the latest IPCC Assessment Report, methane is 34 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas over a 100-year period. For any industry to be emitting this volume of methane would be a concern; but for a renewable sector, whose entire premise is based on being green, this is catastrophic. Aside from the considerable environmental impact, biogas leaks bring other risks. In the worst-case scenario, biogas in combination with air can form an explosive gas mixture which, in a confined space near an ignition source, can result in explosion. While explosions are extremely rare, they bring a high risk of serious injuries and fatalities and, as a result, are something no plant owner ever wants to experience on their site. Biogas also contains hydrogen sulphide (H2S), a toxic gas which has been the cause of several deaths in the UK agricultural industry in relation to slurry tank management. As H2S is heavier than air, it will fall to the ground. In confined, poorly ventilated spaces it can accumulate and remain unnoticed until someone enters, resulting in sometimes fatal effects.  Financial risks Gas leaks in AD plants also have a financial impact. Any volume of biogas leaking into the atmosphere will subsequently reduce a plant’s gas yield and therefore, the owner’s profit margin. In fact, losing just 1m3 of methane per hour will result in a financial loss in the region of £5,000 per year.  There is also the issue of sustainability criteria to consider. In order to receive payments through either the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) or Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) schemes, AD operators must demonstrate that their plant is operating sustainably. Regulators have considered clamping down in this area, as some industry reports mention very high levels of fugitive emissions. Site operators can therefore use gas leakage surveys to protect against potential loss of incentives and demonstrate to the authorities that their plant is well-managed, with leaks kept to a minimum. Leakage hotspots While an AD operator may believe that their plant is operating at a high standard, all anaerobic digesters have inherent weak points which make them susceptible to biogas leakage. Potential hotspots include:

  • Gas membrane connections;
  • Cable grommets (where a submersible stirrer cable passes through the digester wall);
  • Flange connections;
  • Viewing windows;
  • Carbon filters;
  • Any areas where maintenance is carried out.

Reducing risks The risks of gas leakage are clearly significant and often expensive. However, identifying a leak is a simple and affordable process which can help prevent a serious incident from occurring. A gas leakage detection service should therefore form part of any responsible plan operator’s ongoing maintenance programme.  The FM BioEnergy service covers a full AD plant survey with a methane-sensitive monitor and laser, as well as infra-red devices, including:

  • Survey of all tanks, CHP, biogas upgrading equipment, roof membranes, pipes and flanges;
  • Analysis of emissions from CHP and double-membrane covers;
  • Report with images, videos and repair priority table.

While most of FM BioEnergy audits to date have uncovered minor leaks, 25% were found to have serious failings. Fixing these not only prevents a more serious and costly incident from occurring, it often results in a 12-month payback on the price of the survey.

The best times to conduct a detection survey are at the start of full operation; after significant maintenance work; if the feed-to-gas conversion is lower than expected (and the biology remains stable); and of course, if staff can smell biogas. The cost of detecting a potential leak is minimal but implications of leaving it to chance could be disastrous for plant owners.